Under what condition may a PHA terminate assistance for criminal activity?

A public housing agency (PHA) may terminate assistance for criminal activity based on substantial evidence, regardless of whether an arrest or conviction has occurred. This policy is in line with the regulations set forth in the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program, which focuses on maintaining a safe living environment for all participants.

The criteria for terminating assistance are often rooted in the need to ensure the safety of the community and the integrity of the housing program. Substantial evidence might include police reports, witness statements, or other documentation that indicates criminal behavior. The focus on substantial evidence allows PHAs to take action in situations where the safety and security of the community are at risk, enabling them to address issues proactively without being reliant solely on legal proceedings.

In contrast, the other options suggest a more restrictive approach. They imply that only formal legal processes (arrests or convictions) must be met before actions can be taken, which could hinder a PHA’s ability to respond effectively to immediate concerns related to the safety and well-being of the community. Termination based solely on arrests or being arrested without further context would not encompass the broader range of circumstances that might indicate concerning behavior. Therefore, the correct answer emphasizes the importance of holding individuals accountable for their actions through a more comprehensive evaluation