What factors should be considered when determining denial or termination due to actions by family members?

When assessing denial or termination of assistance based on actions by family members, one of the most critical factors to consider is the extent of involvement and the culpability of the specific family member. This means evaluating how directly the family member participated in the action that led to the concern, as well as determining whether they bear responsibility for that action.

In cases where a family member has violated program rules, understanding their level of involvement helps the housing authority make a fair decision regarding the overall family unit. For instance, if the infraction was minor and the family member acted without the knowledge of other household members, it might be less appropriate to penalize the entire family or terminate their housing assistance. Conversely, if the family member played a significant role and is responsible for serious violations, this would warrant stronger actions to ensure compliance with program expectations.

Considering factors like severity or past rental history, while important in the broader analysis, can be secondary to understanding individual culpability as it pertains to current violations. Each case should be evaluated based on its unique circumstances to ensure fair treatment and appropriate responses to infractions.